JMB-HEADER RAS-JOURNALS EIMB Pleiades Publishing

RUS

             

ENG

YearIMPACT-FACTOR
2023  1,500
2022  1,200
2021  1,540
2020  1,374
2019  1,023
2018  0,932
2017  0,977
2016  0,799
2015  0,662
2014  0,740
2013  0,739
2012  0,637
2011  0,658
2010  0,654
2009  0,570
2008  0,849
2007  0,805
2006  0,330
2005  0,435
2004  0,623
2003  0,567
2002  0,641
2001  0,490
2000  0,477
1999  0,762
1998  0,785
1997  0,507
1996  0,518
1995  0,502
Vol 58(2024) N 4 p. 571-587; DOI 10.1134/S0026893324700195 Full Text

O.A. Averina1,2,3, S.A. Kuznetsova1*, O.A. Permyakov1,3, P.V. Sergiev1,2,3

Current Knowledge of Base Editing and Prime Editing

1Institute of Functional Genomics, Moscow State University, Moscow, 119991 Russia
2Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Moscow State University, Moscow, 119991 Russia
3Chemical Faculty, Moscow State University, Moscow, 119991 Russia


*svetlana@belozersky.msu.ru
Received - 2023-11-27; Revised - 2024-01-05; Accepted - 2024-01-09

PE), have proven to provide the efficient and reliable genome editing tools that obviate the need for donor templates and double-strand breaks (DSBs) introduced in DNA. Relatively new, they quickly gained recognition for their accuracy, simplicity, and multiplexing capabilities. The review summarizes the new literature on the technologies and considers their architecture, methods to create editors, specificity, efficiency, and versatility. Advantages and disadvantages of the editors are discussed along with their prospective use in basic and applied research. The review may be useful for planning genome editing studies and analyzing their results to solve various problems of fundamental biology, biotechnology, medicine, and agriculture.

CRISPR/Cas technology, base editing, nucleoside deaminases, prime editing, reverse transcriptase, repair systems



JMB-FOOTER RAS-JOURNALS