JMB-HEADER RAS-JOURNALS EIMB Pleiades Publishing

RUS

             

ENG

YearIMPACT-FACTOR
2022  1,200
2021  1,540
2020  1,374
2019  1,023
2018  0,932
2017  0,977
2016  0,799
2015  0,662
2014  0,740
2013  0,739
2012  0,637
2011  0,658
2010  0,654
2009  0,570
2008  0,849
2007  0,805
2006  0,330
2005  0,435
2004  0,623
2003  0,567
2002  0,641
2001  0,490
2000  0,477
1999  0,762
1998  0,785
1997  0,507
1996  0,518
1995  0,502
Vol 46(2012) N 2 p. 287-303;
L.V. Abaturov*, N.G. Nosova

Crystallographic and NMR Spectroscopic Protein Structures: Interresidue Contacts

Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 119991 Russia

*aba@eimb.ru
Received - 2011-05-03; Accepted - 2011-06-10

Interresidue pair contacts were analyzed in detail for four pairs of protein structures solved using X-ray analysis (X-ray) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). In the four NMR structures, at distances of ≤4.0 Å, the total number of pair contacts was 4-9% lower and, in general, the pair contacts were 0.02-0.16 Å shorter compared to the X-ray structures. Each of the four structural pairs contained 83-94% common pair contacts (CPCs), which were formed by identical residues in both structures; the other 6-17% were longer intrinsic pair contacts (IPCs) formed by different residues in NMR and X-ray structures, while the latter contained more IPC. Every NMR structure contained three types of CPC that were shorter, longer, or equal to the identical contact pairs in the X-ray structure of this protein. Methodologically different short CPCs prevailed at a known distance dependence of the interresidue contact density in 60-61 pairs of NMR/X-ray structures. Among the analyzed four structural pairs, contact shortening appeared upon the energy minimization of the crambin NMR structure and upon solving the ubiquitin, hen lysozyme, and monomeric hemoglobin NMR structures using X-PLOR software with decreased van der Waals atomic radii. The degree of contact shortening in the NMR structures diminished with an increase in the NMR data used to solve these structures. Among the 60 pairs of NMR/X-ray structures, the major difference between α-helical and β-structural proteins in the dependences on interresidue distances of average contact density appeared due to strong α/β differences in the backbone local geometry.

3D protein structure, X-ray analysis, nuclear magnetic resonance, interresidue contacts, methodo-logical difference, α/β structural difference



JMB-FOOTER RAS-JOURNALS